|
"If the Principles Are Gone"
Why don’t we just begin, then, with some of your family background. Where was your family originally from? When did they come to San Antonio? Well, they came from the eastern colonies. That’s the colony of Los Adaes Yes. So, the family you descend from is the Zepeda family? My mother’s family. I have not been able to look into my father’s family. I have someone who has written me about the name. The name originally was spelled T-e-n-e-y-u-c-a, and I’m the only one who has that “a” there. But, as my sister and I were raised by my grandparents, the only thing that I can think is that when my grandmother took a pile of us (there were about three of us at that time) down to be baptized, there was an error made there [at the church registry]. I tried to change it at one time, but there was nothing [I could do]. I called my grandmother, my father [to ask]. I was in about the fourth or fifth grade. But the name was originally T-e-n-e-y-u-c-a, Teneyuca. But you spell it now with an “a”? All my records, my school records, everything else is with an “a”. So, there’s just one spelling, but there are other people who use that name. Now, some of them were related to us. It’s a very rare name; there’s not too many in the whole country. And you don’t know whether that name was long-standing here in San Antonio? No. There is a book, I think, by a fellow by the name of Irvin. Either I-r-v-i-n or I-r-w was the spelling. Now, this was published about forty years ago, but it was just translated. I can’t remember the title of it right now, but it wouldn’t be hard to find. It is based on the trip of a French scientist, and it was written in French. He studied the environment, the plants, the animals, the life, and so forth. He mentions a tribe of Indians that have a name very much like mine. And, so, I don’t know, but I do have a few relatives on my father’s—on his mother's, my grandmother’s—side, and they were Quirozes. They lived in Laredo. Tio [Uncle] Juan Teneyuca was the first one that I met here, and I must have been seven or eight, when they were living at Three Rivers, Texas. And there is one Teneyuca who’s living across the border now, but he was born here. During the depression, he left here because he thought he would never get a chance [to get ahead]. So he became a pharmacist and lives in Laredo, Texas. Now, I’ve had some contact with those people, but not too much. All my contact has been with my maternal relatives. There is a girl here by the name. I had a call from a doctor here; he was an intern. He wanted to know the telephone number of Lisa Teneyuca. So I said, “Look, the only Lisa who I know is my niece, and she’s engaged to be married, and is at the University of Texas.” And I said, “How tall is this girl?” He said, “She’s about 5’ 7”, very beautiful black hair....” She is a daughter of a cousin of my father. My niece, Cheryl, has met her, but I haven’t had a chance yet to meet her. But I did know her mother, and I did know her grandmother. My mother came from this little group here...the Zepedas' grant of land. Have you ever seen this book Land Grants in the...? Yes. The one from the land office? Yes. Yes. All right. Why they picked that land, I don’t know, but it’s very rocky around Helotes, Texas, and beyond there. There’s still a cemetery there of the Zepedas. In Helotes? Yes. And there are some Zepedas living on that land. They may have just about twenty or thirty acres or so. And, so, the name on your maternal side is still Zepeda, then? Oh, yes. My mother’s name was Zepeda. Let’s talk about your early years in San Antonio. When were you born? And tell us something about your early education. Well, let’s see. I was born on December 21, 1916, which is at the end of the year. I don’t think I ever had any birthday cake until I actually demanded it. But it was so close to Christmas, and with tamales, buñuelos, and fruitcakes being made, there wasn’t any time to bake the cake for me. It was too close to Christmas. Yes, too close to Christmas, and no birthday presents, either. I was supposed to wait until Christmas. But I remember that once my mother—I don’t know how old I was—but she said, “This time, I’m going to bake you a cake.” She made some very good cornbread and put sugar in it and also put raisins in it. She says, “Here is your cake.” She was trying to please me; she wasn’t trying to fool me, so I sat down, and I ate a piece of my cake. My cousins were around and said, “Stupid, that isn’t cake; it’s cornbread.” So, I’m shouting, taking my mom’s side, “It isn’t cornbread.” But there were things like that. I was very close.… I grew up with the Zepedas. My grandmother and grandfather had fifteen children. Only seven of those survived. I knew every one of them; I knew some of my grandfather’s brothers. They were a very interesting bunch. Did you speak Spanish at home during this time? Yes. Was Spanish still the primary language in the Zepeda family?
El español que yo hablaba era un español
que los conquistadores trajeron aqui, verdad, porque era “vide por vi;
ansina por asi,” An orchid? An orquidea? No. A clothespin. You see, many of those words were not accepted into the Spanish language. Those were local words? Well, no, I mean there are words…for instance,
chocolate. It was quite a while before it was introduced into the Spanish
language. And I’ve seen very, very few absolutely good Spanish dictionaries.
El Velázquez es un mugrero, I know that from my Cuban background; when I first came to Texas, there were very many words in Spanish that I had never heard of because they were words that came up through the Mexican Spanish, which had a lot of Indian influence. After ten years, I think, the whole Indian population of Cuba had been annihilated, so, therefore, you had to bring in blacks. You have those differences in the words. So the language base is different. Yes. It’s different altogether. Vargas. You’ve heard of him, I’m sure. Oh, yes. Mario Vargas. Now, I’ve been reading this for a while, and it seems I can’t finish it because something comes up. But we would say here, vientecito—a breeze. Their suffix is different. Vientecillo—c-i-l-l-o—you see. There are many other words here. But, actually, I have no difficulty in reading the Spanish. It is very, very easy for me to read it. So the Spanish, then, was maintained throughout the nineteenth century in the Zepeda family? It was; it was in every family. It wasn’t until the '30s that Spanish began to be taught in the schools—in the high schools. A woman by the name of Esther Caravajal wrote one of the first textbooks for the teaching of Spanish in the schools here. What do you think accounts for that? For example, a lot of other groups who came, immigrant groups who came, lost their language very quickly. And, of course, the Mexican-American population is indigenous, and I’m sure that has something to do with it. But why is it that, given all of the influences and all of the prejudices against the Mexican-American population, they were able to maintain the language for as long as they have? Well, the proximity to Mexico, immigration, and the fact that they feel very definitely that they have very deep roots here. Very, very deep roots. Now, I know a girl who was born in Mexico. But her father—and I’ve met entire families like this in San Francisco—was born in Arizona. But during the depression, they went back to Mexico. I don't think they were repatriated. And then they returned again after the depression. They came back just in time to get into World War II. I mean, a whole bunch of boys had entered the service. You had quite a few who were repatriated and who had children. Those sons claimed American citizenship and were of military age. They threw them across the border, and they had to go into the service during World War II. Where in San Antonio did you grow up? On the near West side. Do you know where
Colorado and Brazos and Arbor Place But it was that type of neighborhood, and
what really kept us together was the church—St. Agnes. I made my First
Communion there; I attended catechism classes. I was twelve years old
when I was going to summer classes in catechism, and I knew Father Lockwood.
I’m sorry that I was so busy when I returned. I also had known Jimmy Knight. Of course, that was someone that I was going to see some time, but I never got to see him. You know who Jimmy Knight was? No. He was the...what? County Clerk, or what? County official? Yes. Did the church have a great deal of influence on you as you grew up? Well, yes. When I was growing up, San Antonio
was in a unique position here. Some people were Carrancistas, some followed
Obregón, or Maderistas, This was a meeting place where contractors came to make arrangements with the families who wanted to go to the beet fields or go down to the Valley to pick cotton and so forth. It was also a place where you could walk around; it’s quite a large plaza. I think you’ve seen it. You could go to one corner of the plaza and listen to someone preaching or reading the Bible; you could go to another place, and you could see a group of people, one person reading the newspaper to other workers—the latest news from Mexico. And the people would just be standing in a group and somebody would be reading the newspaper to them? They would be sitting on the grass, sure,
sure. It was there that I learned La Canción de los Magónistas. So, this was sort of like a big public plaza where people came for a variety of different activities. Well, there were also [activities], if you had a little money, you could.… Mostly Mexican people, or different kinds of people? Mostly Mexicans, yes, yes. It was the center of activity. San Antonio was more or less the center where all of these people came. There were the peasants who came. San Antonio has always had a large Spanish-speaking population. But after World War I, or even before World War I, the development of agriculture brought lots of peasants. They had a reason to come. I mean, great heavens, Mexico didn’t have one president who stayed in power in that time. They left office; they were assassinated—Madero, Carranza, Obregón, who else?
So, what was happening in Mexico had very, very much influence on the people here? Oh, it had a tremendous effect here. This was the first place where they came, you see. Now, the Flores Magón brothers had followers here? Oh, yes. They had followers. Regeneración, And you first found out about their activities by going to the plaza? How is it that you became involved in labor ideas? Remember, we didn’t have radios; we didn’t have this; we didn’t have that; we didn’t have a lot of things. So, this going to the plaza and just listening, you see, was our source of information. Theaters were beginning to open, and they were quite influential also. But people went to La Plaza de Zacate. Grandpa would buy us a cone of ice cream, and we’d lick it. Then we’d go around and look. This place was always crowded on Saturdays and particularly Sundays. Where else could people have gone—these Magónistas or the others—where they could speak to a crowd; they already had a crowd. And you used to listen to them? Well, I’d go there, and, you know, I’d listen. I picked up quite a bit. I knew that the Catholics were being thrown out [of Mexico], the Catholic priests. And we didn't have one Mexican priest who came over to our church from Mexico. They were all Spaniards. My grandfather was a Spaniard. He was a very
conscientious, very honest man, a devout Catholic, a good Democrat, but
he was also a man who did something. Remember, at that time here, '24,
the Palmer raids,
What I remember—and I wasn’t too old—I remember that my grandfather called one son, called another, and so forth. They had a meeting at the house. He asked them whether they should vote for Ma Ferguson because her husband was impeached. He had stolen $75,000 from The University of Texas. But Ma Ferguson had taken a very strong stand against the Ku Klux Klan. So, my grandfather rallied the entire Zepeda clan to go forth for her. Even though I was in about the third grade or something like that, I was told, "[We’re] voting for the wife of a man who was impeached." But once she got into office, I would say she was a good administrator. Her husband was quite corrupt. We had things like that. That was when I became aware. Now, I would say I have a faint recollection of hooded parades or something like that. I mean, I remember something that was read by my grandfather, and it always stayed in my mind—only 100% white Protestant Americans, you see. Oh, the Klan was very, very strong here, particularly on this side of town.
Would you say that those were the motivating factors that got you involved in labor organizing? Or, what was it that got you going in that direction? Remember when we went to the plaza what we would see. Did a man come there alone, by himself, on Sundays? No, he brought his family. How were these kids dressed? You’d see them with overalls; sometimes they had shoes, and sometimes they were barefooted. I would just go barefooted when I was a kid. So, they were different; they were different from us. And then, you began to notice those things. I don’t know whether my grandfather read
Spanish, but he certainly read English. He and the whole family took an
interest in politics. Another reason was [that] the politics of San Antonio
was a peculiar one. A name like Zepeda, Carbajal, And, so, the vote.…we
had the poll tax. Was your grandfather interested in labor issues as well? He was very interested; he was certainly interested in civil rights, as far as Catholics were concerned. And he knew that we were, at that time, I guess, a minority and certainly a minority here. What did he do? What was his occupation? My grandfather was a carpenter. He worked in his old age, and he worked quite a few years. He worked in a lumberyard. He had his home; he was a very hard-working man. He read the paper, went to Mass, went to communion, confession once a year—my grandmother couldn’t get him to go more. We would all get together; my cousins would say, “Grandpa’s getting ready to unload.” (Laughter) Well, tell me about your first labor activities and how you actually got involved in them. Well, there were many things that happened here that contributed to the development of my ideas. I think it would have been very hard for me to look at the situation here in San Antonio, and with the background that I had, not to have had the feelings; and then I loved my grandfather very, very much. In 1929 Wall Street crashed; in 1932, the closing of all the banks. My grandfather lost some money in one of them, but he didn’t tell anybody but me. He came over to me and said, “I’ve lost everything I have.” And he was already about, I guess, sixty-five or close to seventy. So, I don’t know, I felt that had an awful effect on me. In that particular family, the Zepedas, my
grandfather and grandmother were wonderful. I had some cousins that I
was very close to…but there were certain members of my mother’s family
who never accepted my father. Para ellos él era indio, verdad, y pues
no lo aceptarón para que le digo, verdad? Este, cuando mi papa murio,
y lo teniamos tendido, entonces todavía vivía el hermano más joven de
mi mamá, de mi madre, y viene y dice, lo vé y dice, “puro indio.” Dijo,
“Si, puro indio.” So there was a sense of discrimination and racism within the community itself. Yes. Now, this brother of my mother married a girl who had been born in Mexico. And he would refer to her as la india. (Laughter) You see, it didn’t keep them from marrying and that sort of thing; it was a peculiar feeling. What were the ideas that were in the air
in those days—the labor ideas? What motivated people? Socialism, Well, I felt at first that I was more of an anarchist than anything else. This came from the anarchist movement here; and it also came from.… There was an anarchist movement in San Antonio? The Magónistas, at one time, had about thirty
or forty [news]papers throughout South Texas, yes. I remember the Wobblies, But San Antonio had, for instance, an election; they had an election one year for city officials—the mayor and so forth—and the next year would be the county [officials]. And my grandparents, they took an interest, but there was always some talk of politics at my grandmother’s—always. And anything new...why, the telephone was there, and they’d discuss it over the phone, that sort of thing. But if you have not read anything about the Great Depression, then I think you should read something because that was one time that the bottom fell out of your free-enterprise system. Some figures that I have seen, I think, said over 5,000, sometimes 6,000, banks went [under]. They closed the doors. Yes. So, there was a general sense, then, among many people that the capitalist system was collapsing.
Oh, yes. You had, if ever you had, a situation there. The unemployed in '32—that was before I became active—demonstrated at the state capitol, demanding work and demanding relief or something or other. And here in San Antonio, what happened? The labor council here— and even now the labor council is more or less controlled by...it’s mostly Mexican—but there was a time here…. I don’t know how much you know about the labor movement, but one of the reasons why it’s so easy to attack the unions by the bankruptcy laws [is that] it’s not like England where you could have a general strike or anything.
You’re organized here on the basis of crafts.
I don’t think I would give Gompers Rebel Voices? Mmmm-hmmm. Now, what role did the CIO play here in San Antonio in the '30s? When was the CIO organized? See, that’s another
thing. There was an industrial [union]; there was the CIO, Committee for
Industrial Organization. Now, what did the NRA do? I mean, it gave workers the right to organize, and it set the minimum wage, the first minimum wage, I think. No. The workers had the right to organize, and it was under that concept that the cigar workers went out on strike here in San Antonio. And, unfortunately, many of these strikes were spontaneous strikes where the workers just walked out. There was no cigar makers’ union, as such?
No, no, no. And this guy, Finck, F-I-N-C-K, this guy here was a devout Catholic. I don’t know where his father is, whether he’s up above or down below somewhere, but he was a louse. How did you get involved? Were you involved with the cigar strike? Oh, yes. Well, I had become very, very interested
in the labor movement. First, there were the anarquistas. And then
you had, also, the influence in the CTM. [The labor movement was] the salvation of all those who were hungry, and there were many. And what I saw here...it’s only recently that I have been able to talk about some of the things that I saw here as far as poverty. The poverty was just too difficult.
So, the cigar strikers
were among the first; they were women. It’s peculiar; it’s the women—I
mean COPS The dual role. The dual role; it’s difficult. And I don’t think that women or any of the minorities will ever be completely and totally free until you have socialism. You don’t have this. What you have in Russia…I mean, what could you expect of a country that was governed by an absolute monarch, that had no history of democracy, where the KGB, or whatever it is…. If they had one now, you could imagine the spies. Besides, Russia is not 100% European. She’s European and Asiatic. And I don’t know what they can expect, this idea of democracy.... Who are the democrats? Who are the democratic countries? A handful of [European countries]; and, damn, if they haven’t been the worst exploiters—England, Spain. See, I do not look upon Europe to give us anything historical. They’re bogged down in a mess themselves. And, look, it was not the blacks, the savages, or the Indians who brought about a government such as the Hitler regime. It was a modern nation of philosophers, musicians. I think after four, almost five hundred years of European domination that this next period will be one of revolt against European domination. And there are lots of lives being lost in Nicaragua and these other places. It
was only in France where they obliterated the ruling class. You still
have people with titles, but they don’t get any money. In England they
accommodated themselves. So, every country will have a different type
of adjustment to make. As far as Communism, with dictatorship and proletariat
and all that sort of thing, I don’t know. I read the Duclos article in
1939, But
I don’t know; I became very, very interested. I read quite a bit. Well,
I didn’t read all of Das Kapital, but I read Value, Price and
Profit, Wage, Labor & Capital. So I had an idea of how capital
was made, how it was used, and so forth. The injunctions were used after
the Hatters by people who didn’t even know the history. The Hatters, where
was it? It was in Boston some place, or in Connecticut, I think it was,
the Hatters’ strike. The labor movement here in San Antonio had
a different history. Then you had the groups such as the Greens Now, with the pecan shellers, you said it was a spontaneous movement. Well, let’s say that the workers had had
quite a bit of experience here. They were influenced also by the CTM,
the union. That union came under Toledano. If you read the beginning of this type, of this little thing here (looking in a book), you cannot find a better description of the role of the Socialist and that we have made certain gains, and this is it. And these Socialists have prominent positions
in certain places as a result of the struggles of the workers. But there,
the question was always one of land, and it wasn’t tackled in Mexico until
the time of Cárdenas. Roosevelt—the first Roosevelt, Theodore Roosevelt—had
a liberal approach; he was an Imperialist, but he had a liberal approach.
There were many people in Minnesota and in Wisconsin who were Germans
and who had been Socialists in Germany. They were interested in pushing
for labor and establishing a labor party. You go to the Socialists, “No,
this is a worker’s organization,” and they would not cooperate. They didn’t
cooperate until after Berger Did you have that in the local movement here in San Antonio? You did not have it [factionalism] in the
local movement. When I say the local movement, I will refer to the Workers
Alliance. So, as the Workers Alliance, it had a program—work,
public works, etc. It fought for WPA This was under the NIRA? No, no. NIRA was purely industrial, National Industrial Recovery Act; that clearly stated the right of the workers to organize. This was the impetus? This is what got the Workers Alliance moving? It got the Workers Alliance [moving]. This
was under Roosevelt. And the Wagner Labor Relations Act It was here, in San Antonio? Here in San Antonio, yes. That gives you an idea of how the powers that be, here in San Antonio, had fought labor; so when you went out to meet those powers, then you had to have guts. Perhaps I escaped any injury, and so forth, because I was quite young; I was a citizen; I had an Indian name. It’s peculiar; there was an article written by a fellow whom I knew here. Do you have any connection with or have you met any members of the Newspaper Guild? Which newspaper? Well, it’s only the Light, No; no, I haven’t. All right. I knew a fellow by the name of [Allen] Turner here, and he’s written some very good articles on Starr County, which is one of the poorest. This guy Manges owns about, I think, 80% of the wealth that is underneath the ground, the mineral deposits and so forth. It’s hard to buy land. This is why I feel that you need a study, an in-depth study, of man and resources before you actually plan to come forth with a program. And it has to include bilingual education. Apparently, from what I’ve been able to read about the activities in the '30s, there was a tremendous amount of repression here in San Antonio against the labor movement. Was this something that was orchestrated? I wish somebody, someday, from somewhere,
would come in here and write the history of their articles, and so on,
but they do not. There was a fellow by the name of West. His brother is now a big shot here. West was elected sheriff here. The second time that the workers...the NRA gave them [the workers] the right to organize, and they didn’t even go. They didn’t even want the American Federation of Labor, but the union sent out a representative. Like I said, they were organized and [they] joined, and what they wanted, I think, was to make it a CIO union or something like that. There was no CIO yet, and they did not want to affiliate with the Trades Council here. AF of L? To the AF of L, yeah. So what you had, essentially then, was AF of L here locally, and that was it? You had an AF of L; you had a carpenters’
union; you had a welders’ union; you had iron workers; you had plumbers;
all in different unions. And those unions benefited tremendously from
the work that we did in getting more projects here. As a result of the
pecan strike, you had the Apache Courts
They reopened the Paseo del Rio, all of that, the Arneson Theater, with WPA [projects]. Arneson was a guy that got it from me. He was a WPA. We would visit him about once a week and say, "All right, we want you to send a message. We want more jobs for our people.” And then we would go to the WPA offices and take people. At first, they permitted aliens or non-citizens [to work on projects of the various programs]. Then, they decided that it would be only citizens. So, as soon as the youngsters in the family reached an age, why, we went down there and took them and got jobs for them. And it’s this...it was this that opened up [jobs for our people]. This demand of an organization opened up the trade spots. There weren’t too many carpenters, but the carpenters’ union; the welders’ union; the bricklayers’ union; and the electrical workers’ union met here; and other unions. I think you would still find that they are primarily Anglo-American. What was the attitude of those unions—the AF of L—toward the Mexican organizing? Well, this is the thing: they gave us some type of support, but after I became a Communist, they didn’t give any support whatever. But, nevertheless, most of my work.… I didn’t join the Party until after 1937, about '39, when I got married. But the hod (brick) carriers, we gave them help in organizing, and, in fact, if a worker, a Mexican worker, was.… Let me see, do I have this? I just wonder if you have a copy of this. Have you read this? No, I haven’t. All right. You will not find it. If it’s in the library, you will not be able to check it out. It would probably cost you about $25 or $30 to get it now. But if you can, if you can get it from your library.… Now, let me see if I can find some of this in here. (Reading from text)
Some idea of the living conditions among the pecan workers may be gained from the fact that only sixty, or twelve percent, had running water in their homes. Only nine percent had inside sanitary toilets, while thirty-nine percent had old-fashioned “privies.” The balance had outdoor toilets, either of the sanitary pit type constructed in large numbers in recent years by WPA labor, or with cesspool or sewer connections. Lighting facilities were
equally primitive. Only twenty-five percent of the families had electric
lights. The other three-fourths used kerosene lamps. But that isn’t the worst part of it. Health, look at health. 1938 was the hardest year because by that time the depression had really struck every city, every place. (Reading from text) Beet workers were the aristocracy among the Mexican farm laborers, earning an average of $4.90 per person, per week. Average family earnings for a job in beet work amounted to $260, compared with only $69, per job, in cotton. This is partly explained by the fact that the average beet job lasted 189 days, compared with only sixty-three days for the average cotton job. It may be pointed out
that 1938 was an unusually bad year for the agricultural workers, particularly
in cotton, where reduced acreage and a short crop made picking conditions
poor.
This will give you an
idea. But that is not the worst.
This survey did not find enough people in blue-collar work jobs or anything
like that, to be able to make any type of analysis.
There is even worse.
Who were the people here? Now, the Workers Alliance organized the unemployed, and there were lots of unemployed. There were people who were coming back. Now, the Mexican workers—and these were all people, about sixty to seventy percent, sixty percent or more, let’s say—were people who had come here in 1910 after the first uprising in Mexico. And they had no skills; these people were recruited; these were people who were peasants. The work that they fitted into was agriculture. They worked here in San Antonio during the winter months, and they shelled pecans, and this is the way they lived. They made a bit of money there, and then about March or April—sometimes earlier—or May, they’d start getting on the trucks and going to the Valley. They’d start here. Some of them would go to Colorado and wind up in Michigan in the beet fields. If they had a good year, they would come back. They would buy a little piece of land and then start building little shacks. I could talk to you about people who live not too far away from here. They are people who were born here, that were born in Floresville, and they went there every year to pick fruits, strawberries and so forth. Every year, every summer, the father had a job; he would leave the job and then go back in there and go with them and take his whole family. And these are girls about thirty-five; they’re under forty. So the Workers Alliance, then, was dedicated to.…
The Workers Alliance was an organization for the unemployed. And I think it did a tremendous job because all of the housing projects that are here are due to the Workers Alliance. All of the jobs—La Villita, Paseo del Rio [Riverwalk], the Arneson Theater—all of that work was work.… Where did this emerge—the Workers Alliance—you said it was a national organization. Who organized it? Who put it together? I told you. They were organized by the Communists and the Socialists. And we had a branch here; I think we had more than 10,000 workers. We had committees that went to the WPA. We had our meetings every Sunday. And it was a meeting of this Workers Alliance that set off that....
All right, wait just a minute. If you read
this book,
So it was the Workers Alliance, then, that came to their support? That’s right. It was we
who organized. There again, you see the work of your Communist Party.
I was removed because I was a Communist. I was removed from leadership
of the Workers Alliance of the CIO. At the time, my ex-husband, Homer,
who was the secretary of the Communist Party, had met with Henderson.
I continued to work with the committees, the strike committees and so forth. We had no trouble whatever until after I left. Then there were strikes; there were spontaneous strikes. You don’t have those if you have a good organizer. If I had to give any credit to myself, I would say that I was a darn good organizer, and if I did, it was because I read quite a bit about the anarchists’ secret organization.
The Wobblies could come into a town and establish free speech. One would come by railroad—they'd ride the rods—then they’d come into a town. They had one group that would go out. That group would be arrested. They’d get another group to get up and speak, and then another group would fill the damn jail. And you had lawyers there.
Right now, I am amazed; I am surprised; I am disappointed by the intellectuals of America. They don’t know how to answer this question. First, they spend too much money on projects and so forth for the poor, for building up, for cleaning up the air, for cleaning up the water. They don’t know how to answer that some of the young leaders have been spending too much money. We’ve been spending too much money on armaments. We haven’t had any peace since World War II. We've had troops in Korea, Vietnam, South America, Europe. We cannot continue to do that. And here, I don’t know...I was reading this
morning’s paper. Why covert actions? Why make the policy of our country
a terrorist one under people such as North and Poindexter? No, I didn’t see that. So this man [Reagan] has brought our country to the bottom, and many people think that he’s being crucified by the press. But, anyway, you could not think of the pecan workers without thinking of the unemployed because this was the only organization that gave them something to eat, gave them jobs. What is it that motivated you to become formally affiliated with the Communist Party? Was that something many people were doing, the labor activists here? Yes, it was actually the Communists who built the CIO and then were thrown out because of this very narrow type policy. In the Workers Alliance, we had anarchists, we had one or two Socialists, and one of the Socialists became our secretary, a fellow by the name of Chavarría. All right. If I had sat down and said, “You’re a Socialist; you’re an Anarchist,...” but you do not [do that]. You set objectives for immediate objectives and strategy. I am given credit for having started this movement here, and I think I mentioned the women here have followed through with COPS. It’s wonderful; I’m happy I’m given credit if they want to give me credit, and if they don’t, I’ll stay home and read. (Laughter) It doesn’t matter to me; I didn’t keep one piece of paper or anything because I never gave it any importance. When I left here, about '48, '49, I couldn’t have gotten a job; I couldn’t obtain a job; I couldn’t do anything. None of the unions would have me, although they sought my help when they got out on strike—laundry workers, cement workers, etc. Again, I continued to help, but I just did...I felt, well, what in the mischief? I was beginning to miss more and more meals. I’ve come from a family of eleven; I was one of the oldest. I couldn’t get a job; I couldn’t help; I couldn’t do anything, so I left San Antonio. I went to San Francisco and stayed there for twenty years, and to my surprise, I return, and I find myself some sort of a heroine. Well, I’ll tell you the truth, one of the first things that threw me into the limelight is this nomination for the Texas Hall of Fame. (Laughter) And I sat right here and talked to a woman from Austin, and I said, “I don’t want to go down.” She said, “You’ve got to come down.” I talked to her over the phone just a couple of days ago because I told her I was going to the hospital. And I just wondered whether I should have or not because if the principles of labor...if the principles are gone on which this country is based...if they cannot be recognized by the modern generation and carried on.… It was wonderful that I was born at the time I was born—I mean when there was activity with the Ku Klux Klan and so forth. And I had a priest who was born—I think he was an Englishman, but I don’t know whether he was born in Canada or England—but he had seen some of the work there and the antipathy towards Catholics. He was a convert. I remember our catechism class. Were you raised a Catholic? Yes. Well, I remember one of the stories. He tried to tell us, tried to teach us that we were living in a Protestant country, and I think it was Boston or a Massachusetts city...I mean, a city in Massachusetts. And it was a Catholic worker who was foreign-born, who came over and confessed to the priest that he had stolen some things, and he wanted them returned. The priest was arrested when he wouldn’t reveal the name of the man who had done the robbery. He was jailed. At that time, it seemed that there were a bunch of men, civil rights advocates, who rose up to defend him, and he was freed. He told us about that. And when was that? Oh, I guess when I was in catechism. I was in catechism before I was six until, as I told you, about twelve or thirteen. Then, let me see...what else was there that he told us; there was something else. There was a letter written by the nuns from Louisiana before the Louisiana Purchase, and it was written to Jefferson, and it asked specifically, “What guarantee do we have that our religious rights will be defended?” And he wrote just a short little note saying, “Your rights are defended under the First Amendment to the Constitution.” You will find this letter published in some of the books in Catholic readers, Catholic histories. So we haven’t always had...and the Irish had a heck of a time. After the activities in '38, '39, did you make a conscious decision to retire from labor organizing? No, it was forced on me because I couldn’t find jobs, so I left. You left in '48, you say? About '48 or '49. What did you do during the period 1940 to 1948? Is that when you were just looking for work? Well, I held a job here for a while; I held another job; these were very poor-paying jobs. I wanted to go to school; I went to school here for about a year and a half at night, and, yes, I told you, the organization continued. Through the '40s? Oh, yes, absolutely. There were laundry workers who tried to organize; there were cement workers; there were petitions...whatever I could help and whatever I could do. And there was quite a mass basis here at that time, and some of those workers, who were in the strike and went with it and worked with the Workers Alliance, went down to organize the onion workers, etc. They desegregated a theater, asked for classes at school, classes at night to learn English, and so forth. So, there were some valuable experiences there. But you don’t stick to one party. I never did it. How do I feel about the Communists? I would like to see a history, not just of the Communists, but of the Left Wing movement and its narrow, factional, sectarian approach. Did you know some of the Communist leaders at the national level?
I attended one convention, that was all.
The woman for whom I had the greatest admiration was, of course, Elizabeth
Gurley Flynn. The man for whom I had admiration was not Browder, What about your husband? What influence did he have on you during that period? Well,… ...if that’s not too personal.
Well, no; we’re different persons all together. He was one of these inflexible Communists. He wouldn't make an allowance for anything. He didn’t have a sense of humor. My background was absolutely different from his; I understand. He died before 1968. The last time I saw him was in 1945, right after the war. I think that he got a taste of the bureaucracy and the dictatorship in the Communist Party. He was the secretary of the party, and he was.… At the national level? No, state. And he was a good organizer, a good theoretician, everything else. But, listen, do you want to stop now? It’s all right with me. No, I’m fine. He was very, very inflexible when it came to...very inflexible. But, anyway, what happened there was he received his orders from the draft board to go down and register. And instead of going down and registering, what he did was, he joined the Merchant Marines and went off to New York in the hopes that he could stay here on the coast and work. You had an organization of seamen on the East Coast that was absolutely tops, and they were progressing, and so forth. And then, everything is lost. You organize the auto workers, and that is lost. So, when he did that, the Communist Party had already changed its line, so without notice or anything, he was expelled from the party. He should have gone down because Russia had been attacked. So, that was quite a blow to him. He stayed in the Merchant Marines, and then he got out. I saw him when he returned to San Antonio, and that was the last time. I was in a hurry, he was in a hurry, and that was the last time I saw him. But I would say that the relationship from the very beginning was not...and maybe, perhaps, I wasn’t ready for marriage, either; that was something else. Well, he kept on trying [marriage]. He was married a first time, second time, third time...he had four marriages. But he died quite young. He developed a heart condition. This is sort of amusing to me because I talked to this person who lived in Los Angeles, where he worked and where he married. She said he was a wonderful husband. They had no children, but the woman he married had two children and was very, very nice. And she adds, "He kept that garage cleaner than my front room." (Laughter) But, I just don't know...it was a marriage of tremendous passion and so forth. I had problems, too. I’d been fed cod liver oil, I’d been fed goat’s milk, and so forth, so I would never get TB, and then I did get tuberculosis. I don’t know if that affected the marriage. As I look back, it was...I was brought up in a certain way. It was a long time before I could get him out of my mind, but I don’t know. I could look back and some of the humor, some of the things that I considered humorous, well, he didn’t even see it. (Laughter) I want you just to perhaps evaluate the change in American society since the time when you were active—the discrimination, the problems of the '30s—to today, with regard to the Mexican-American community. Do you think that there has been significant, substantial change? Is there hope for a future, or does the basic economic system we operate under cause a long-term problem for us? I would say that the times are absolutely different. Unfortunately, American history books, especially at the high school level—and I examined about three of them here in 1968, but I haven’t examined any since then—were not analytical. They were not critical. You will find history books that will tell you that we still don’t know why the depression occurred, the worldwide depression.
England went on the bill. Certainly, World
War I had a lot to do with it. Why did we have a World War II? The unbearable,
actually, the unbearable load of money that Germany had to pay us, which
actually stripped their economy. Germany never had what you would call
a true democratic society. The influence of the military there was always
predominant. And the Kaiser could veto any bill that was passed by the
Reichstag. It would be difficult to say that minorities have not advanced. You will find quite a few members in the state legislature, a few senators, but quite a number who are Mexican. You will find a number who are in the Senate. You will find a lot of blacks. But, again, you have a split there; you have a split. You have quite a number of Negroes in the Republican Administration. You even had an Indian. God, how generous can these Anglo-Americans be? This fellow was an intelligent guy, but not a diplomat. So, he asked, “Well, what are the conditions?” I mean, this man had an Indian there explaining very bad conditions on the reservation, and so he [the other man] says, “It is as Mr. So and So says.” He was Italian. (Laughter) I don’t know how long he kept his job. But you have a generation that enjoyed the post-war prosperity; there were all kinds of jobs and everything else available. You have an economy here...remember, ours was a commercial civilization. We would sell soup spoons or spoon holders anywhere. There wasn’t any problem or machine or anything that we could not apply to ourselves. In that respect, we are a marvelous nation. I have expected my country, your country, to become the scientific Athens, but I don’t think that will be the case. They have been diverted into the same type of thing that Hitler was diverted to. Socialism does have an appeal. So the Nazis call it social-Nazism...what was it? National socialism. National socialism. I think that the situation now is...you have a stronger element in the light now than you had before. And it’s better organized; it has a lot of money. And just the fact that these things happen, and that man in the White House still stands there and gets up and makes a speech, “Well, the big show is yet to come.” The fact that he stands there and makes that type of statement when he’s undermined, when he has almost, I would say, substituted covert actions for state diplomacy. Many people of the United States still think he is being crucified by the press. Our background doesn’t give a lot of people ability to analyze and to look upon this as another awful scandal. In two years we removed one president without firing a single shot, and I was very proud of that. But this guy, you take the arrogance of that guy, Reagan: “Talk between the president and me is confidential, and it can’t be told.” Lying, I don’t know. I once read that, among those graduates at West Point, you wouldn’t find any liars and cowards, but you got Poindexter; you got North. I mean, these guys filled their minds that covert actions, terrorism—the same type that we’re trying to fight—is going to solve the problem. You’ve got very difficult problems nationally. We have seen a state of existence down in our country when we used to get revenue funds. I’ve paid income tax; I didn’t pay any last year because I didn’t work much, but tax money will be returned. All right, my water bill.… I don’t use that much water, even a bath every night, the flushing of toilets. It wouldn’t amount to that. All right, but you have it separated now. And so, my bill here [where I live] alone. When I have the children here, it’s been different, but it’s very high, very, very high. And I have a fixed income. I also have a lien on this house. It’s going down quickly, but I built a room in the back, so the two boys can have their own rooms. There has been a cut down in whatever type of medical services that are given to children of tenant farmers...not tenant farmers, but farmers in the South. Most of the babies in a certain place in North Carolina are still delivered by midwives. But these are women who report to clinics and are with the women and so forth; and this type of thing [that is] so needed is being cut.
We have, I think, about 27,000 homeless people in New York alone. Why do we have these? [Where is] the money that we have in all the tax credits, the taxes that we haven’t been imposing so that business could really take the initiative and tackle the recession. We’ve been throwing millions of dollars into this Star Wars. We do not have an adequate housing plan. So far, only one bill has passed, and that is the Clean Water Act, and that is signed. I think it’s about $20 billion. This is a start, but how much will we get done in this week, and what is going to happen? What about the unemployed? He [Reagan] has spoken about retraining, but where in the mischief are those programs? He’s nothing but a bag of hot air. Hollywood, you could have done better. (Laughter) So, your minorities, yes, your minorities are going to suffer, I think. Look at the attitude towards the migrants who come here. I could see and I could show you documentation. Carter permitted 300 to come into the Valley and work, to pick melons or something. In 1954 under Truman—it was before that—the beet fields were ready to be worked; this was in El Paso. What was it, the [Great Western] Sugar Company of Colorado, or something like that. Because of the fact that there had been so many repatriations, the [Mexican] government of Lázaro Cárdenas kept wanting to place soldiers to keep the Mexican workers from [going across the border]. The sugar owners, owners of the fields, had cars all ready, trains, to carry the workers out there. There was a guy by the name of Cortez, an
uncle of this guy Ernie Cortez, who wrote a letter. He was a member of
the LULAC This scandal [the Iran-Contra affair], how
far, how deep it will go? I don’t think Mr. Reagan will be invited to
any conferences in New York. So, I would say that your minorities during
this period would suffer...blacks, Indians. But where are the intellectuals:
Where are the Clarence Darrows? You know who Clarence Darrow is? I’m not gonna get pessimistic,
but then, I really don’t know. What are the feelings of these people in
Nicaragua? What are the feelings of these people? Cuba has already said
that if the United States invades Nicaragua that they would come in. What
about the situation in Lebanon? That’s explosive. You don’t know what’s
going to happen there from day to day. So, I just don’t know.
|